Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32181 - 32190 of 68502 for did.
Search results 32181 - 32190 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
whether the [officer] did in fact violate a rule or order. 4. Whether the effort described under subd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57413 - 2014-09-15
whether the [officer] did in fact violate a rule or order. 4. Whether the effort described under subd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57413 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Pedro Figueroa
, it was “triple X.” Defense counsel did not object to the officer’s No. 99-2842-CR 4 testimony. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16168 - 2017-09-21
, it was “triple X.” Defense counsel did not object to the officer’s No. 99-2842-CR 4 testimony. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16168 - 2017-09-21
County of Waukesha v. Laura J.M.
, but that she did not have appreciation of how these medications help her remain stable and did not want to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3913 - 2005-03-31
, but that she did not have appreciation of how these medications help her remain stable and did not want to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3913 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kurt Gilkes
with a prohibited alcohol concentration. On appeal, he alleges that the complaint was insufficient because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11646 - 2005-03-31
with a prohibited alcohol concentration. On appeal, he alleges that the complaint was insufficient because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11646 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Harris
that the officers did not have sufficient reason to stop the car, the trial court held that Harris lacked standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31
that the officers did not have sufficient reason to stop the car, the trial court held that Harris lacked standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31
Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
of an intoxicant and speeding. Woodman argues that his arrest was not based on probable cause because the Town did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant and speeding. Woodman argues that his arrest was not based on probable cause because the Town did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
,” as well as his torso. Patterson—noting the picture did not feature full-frontal nudity—argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524367 - 2022-05-25
,” as well as his torso. Patterson—noting the picture did not feature full-frontal nudity—argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524367 - 2022-05-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
absent authentication of Lucetta’s signatures. We disagree. The circuit court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123397 - 2017-09-21
absent authentication of Lucetta’s signatures. We disagree. The circuit court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123397 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Montgomery because the sentencing court did not consider how he, as a juvenile offender, was different from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476741 - 2022-01-25
and Montgomery because the sentencing court did not consider how he, as a juvenile offender, was different from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476741 - 2022-01-25
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary A. Miller
10, 1998 traffic accident." The judgment did not specifically state that the money should come from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24
10, 1998 traffic accident." The judgment did not specifically state that the money should come from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24