Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3221 - 3230 of 7290 for WA 0812 2782 5310 RAB Renovasi Interior Rumah Minimalis Plus Toko Berpengalaman Sidoharjo Wonogiri.

Robert D. Zitowsky v. Dane County
for felony cases that actually go to trial. The average is $9 - $1100 plus one day of trial. Considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13651 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jenelle Glasbrenner
an Alford[1] plea to the charge and was ordered to pay a fine of $5000 plus costs, which she did. ¶10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17883 - 2005-05-02

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
and forth, EDR credited Kottwitz $1,712.08, leaving an unpaid balance of $61,675.86 plus interest. EDR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17

COURT OF APPEALS
the credibility of the witnesses, and resolving conflicts in testimony, Tang v. C.A.R.S. Prot. Plus, Inc., 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124638 - 2014-10-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The panel ultimately awarded the law firm the full amount of its unpaid fees and expenses, plus interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93178 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to and was convicted of repeated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to five years of initial confinement plus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010025 - 2025-09-18

State v. Karen A.O.
agreed to have twelve jurors plus the two alternate jurors decide the case. That means 12 of the 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9932 - 2005-03-31

City of Madison v. Carl J. Bock
Bock’s license for six months, imposed a fine of $540.25 plus a $15 witness fee, and ordered mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13109 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of Hroscikoski’s missing belongings, plus attorney and court fees, totaling $4,200. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51829 - 2010-07-07

Jennifer Redding v. Mark Ralfs
of their security deposit plus costs. Ralfs now appeals. II. Analysis. Ralfs first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11426 - 2005-03-31