Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3221 - 3230 of 69083 for as he.
Search results 3221 - 3230 of 69083 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Stephen Pritchard
. SNYDER, J. Stephen Pritchard appeals from an order finding that he refused to submit to a chemical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8478 - 2017-09-19
. SNYDER, J. Stephen Pritchard appeals from an order finding that he refused to submit to a chemical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8478 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals a judgment of conviction for misdemeanor possession of THC. Konkol contends he was seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30099 - 2014-09-15
appeals a judgment of conviction for misdemeanor possession of THC. Konkol contends he was seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30099 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
alleges that he or she did not understand information that should have been provided at the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48616 - 2010-04-06
alleges that he or she did not understand information that should have been provided at the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48616 - 2010-04-06
[PDF]
State v. John M. Shelley
appeals from an order finding that he wrongfully refused to submit to a chemical test of his blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12637 - 2017-09-21
appeals from an order finding that he wrongfully refused to submit to a chemical test of his blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12637 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
not have been revoked, because the investigating officer lacked probable cause to believe that he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
not have been revoked, because the investigating officer lacked probable cause to believe that he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
child enticement. Mills argues he: (1) was denied due process because he was not present during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52724 - 2014-09-15
child enticement. Mills argues he: (1) was denied due process because he was not present during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52724 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not have been revoked, because the investigating officer lacked probable cause to believe that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129453 - 2017-09-21
not have been revoked, because the investigating officer lacked probable cause to believe that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and with use of a dangerous weapon. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380167 - 2021-06-22
and with use of a dangerous weapon. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380167 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
alleges that he or she did not understand information that should have been provided at the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48616 - 2014-09-15
alleges that he or she did not understand information that should have been provided at the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48616 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
'the range of punishments to which he [the defendant] is subjecting himself by entering a plea.'") (citing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171629 - 2017-09-21
'the range of punishments to which he [the defendant] is subjecting himself by entering a plea.'") (citing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171629 - 2017-09-21