Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3221 - 3230 of 3970 for davie.
Search results 3221 - 3230 of 3970 for davie.
2007 WI APP 36
: On behalf of the respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of J. David Rice of Rice, Heitman & Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28134 - 2007-03-27
: On behalf of the respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of J. David Rice of Rice, Heitman & Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28134 - 2007-03-27
State v. Brian D. Seefeldt
on an error of law or does not reason its way to a rational conclusion. See State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, ¶28
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16530 - 2005-03-31
on an error of law or does not reason its way to a rational conclusion. See State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, ¶28
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16530 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307953 - 2020-11-25
and Davis, JJ. Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307953 - 2020-11-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
this issue on appeal. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 517, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33496 - 2014-09-15
this issue on appeal. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 517, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33496 - 2014-09-15
WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1022-CR Complete Title...
“The confrontation right applies to statements that are ‘testimonial.’ Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106992 - 2014-03-25
“The confrontation right applies to statements that are ‘testimonial.’ Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106992 - 2014-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
Greenfield appears to argue that the remand court did not apply the proper legal standard. State v. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=937693 - 2025-06-17
Greenfield appears to argue that the remand court did not apply the proper legal standard. State v. Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=937693 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the [circuit] court’s discretion.” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶19, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109209 - 2017-09-21
the [circuit] court’s discretion.” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶19, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109209 - 2017-09-21
Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
of Matthew J. Flynn, Jeffrey O. Davis and Keith A. Bruett, of Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee and John P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3923 - 2005-03-31
of Matthew J. Flynn, Jeffrey O. Davis and Keith A. Bruett, of Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee and John P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3923 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eugene Nichols v. Jon Litscher
: For the petitioner there were briefs by Jeffrey O. Davis, Daniel J. La Fave and Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16369 - 2017-09-21
: For the petitioner there were briefs by Jeffrey O. Davis, Daniel J. La Fave and Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16369 - 2017-09-21
John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31