Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3221 - 3230 of 69007 for had.
Search results 3221 - 3230 of 69007 for had.
Stephanie D. Irby v. Stanley H. Hunt
with the scheduling order had been egregious and without justifiable excuse, and dismissed Irby's complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8671 - 2005-03-31
with the scheduling order had been egregious and without justifiable excuse, and dismissed Irby's complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8671 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dwight Gustafson
Sheriff’s Department dispatcher that an off-duty deputy had called in information indicating that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2152 - 2005-03-31
Sheriff’s Department dispatcher that an off-duty deputy had called in information indicating that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2152 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dural Nicholson
had probable cause to arrest Nicholson for loitering and denied his motion. Nicholson subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8439 - 2017-09-19
had probable cause to arrest Nicholson for loitering and denied his motion. Nicholson subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8439 - 2017-09-19
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
of these regards. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND Paul and Malyn married in 1975 and had three minor children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
of these regards. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND Paul and Malyn married in 1975 and had three minor children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dural Nicholson
arrest was unlawful. The trial court concluded the police officers had probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8439 - 2005-03-31
arrest was unlawful. The trial court concluded the police officers had probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a witness. Richardson argued that there had been a discovery violation. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89601 - 2014-09-15
as a witness. Richardson argued that there had been a discovery violation. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89601 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
told Roesler that he had “just missed” Jones and that Jones had just gotten out of the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262190 - 2020-05-28
told Roesler that he had “just missed” Jones and that Jones had just gotten out of the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262190 - 2020-05-28
State v. Russell Stokes
Stokes would regularly visit them when he was in Milwaukee, and because he had not done so on April 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
Stokes would regularly visit them when he was in Milwaukee, and because he had not done so on April 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
Holly R. v. Joseph T.
defender’s office had said that someone would come to the jail for a conference, but that no-one had done so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
defender’s office had said that someone would come to the jail for a conference, but that no-one had done so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
testified that on two separate occasions her father had reached a hand inside her pants and touched her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31968 - 2014-09-15
testified that on two separate occasions her father had reached a hand inside her pants and touched her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31968 - 2014-09-15