Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3221 - 3230 of 58546 for speedy trial.

State v. Dale Iversen
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Iversen contends the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jose Soto
contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his pre-sentence motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-05-09

[PDF] NOTICE
)(a) and No. 2006AP270-CR 2 939.05 (2003-04).1 Boose claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27239 - 2014-09-15

State v. Russell Stokes
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31

Village of Menomonee Falls v. Paul G. Meyer
. The issue in this appeal is whether ยง 800.14(4), Stats., permits a new trial in the circuit court when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14758 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Charles M. Olson v. Diane C. Olson
twice reversed the award of maintenance to Diane and remanded the matter to the trial court for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9355 - 2017-09-19

State v. Dimitri Henley
denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether his motion to dismiss during the first trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4490 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roy J. Jones
for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court erred when it concluded that most of his claims were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20700 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Menomonee Falls v. Paul G. Meyer
), STATS., permits a new trial in the circuit court when the case was judicially resolved, but its merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14758 - 2017-09-21

State v. Roy J. Jones
argues that the trial court erred when it concluded that most of his claims were barred under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20700 - 2005-12-19