Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32201 - 32210 of 97695 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32201 - 32210 of 97695 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
] Nevertheless, the same logic would extend to charge concessions in this case—the circuit court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60766 - 2011-03-07
] Nevertheless, the same logic would extend to charge concessions in this case—the circuit court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60766 - 2011-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 1, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 1, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
court did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Why a day and a half [to try the case to the court]? I mean, if we waive the jury trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25
. Why a day and a half [to try the case to the court]? I mean, if we waive the jury trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
of continuing CHIPS. Accordingly, I agree with the circuit court that in this case that JNOV on the continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
of continuing CHIPS. Accordingly, I agree with the circuit court that in this case that JNOV on the continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
defendant in this case is Noble Construction, Inc., and that a court commissioner ordered Flint’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33745 - 2008-08-13
defendant in this case is Noble Construction, Inc., and that a court commissioner ordered Flint’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33745 - 2008-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
for his cooperation in this case. The trial court denied relief, finding that Lee was not a credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39043 - 2009-08-05
for his cooperation in this case. The trial court denied relief, finding that Lee was not a credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39043 - 2009-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 22, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44868 - 2009-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 22, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44868 - 2009-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 27, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71515 - 2011-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 27, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71515 - 2011-09-26