Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32201 - 32210 of 58254 for speedy trial.
Search results 32201 - 32210 of 58254 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint from the Jefferson County case. 2 ¶4 Before the jury trial, the prosecution filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143517 - 2017-09-21
complaint from the Jefferson County case. 2 ¶4 Before the jury trial, the prosecution filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143517 - 2017-09-21
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8249 - 2005-03-31
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8249 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of $1,696.50, with costs, following a bench trial, to Beau Serchen and Jena Nelson (hereafter “the couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04
of $1,696.50, with costs, following a bench trial, to Beau Serchen and Jena Nelson (hereafter “the couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04
[PDF]
James F. Karls v. David P. Geraghty
. The criminal trial was scheduled to begin, but Karls failed to appear. The court revoked Karls’ bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12666 - 2017-09-21
. The criminal trial was scheduled to begin, but Karls failed to appear. The court revoked Karls’ bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, following a jury trial, of causing a child younger than thirteen to view sexually explicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99569 - 2014-09-15
of conviction, following a jury trial, of causing a child younger than thirteen to view sexually explicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99569 - 2014-09-15
Paul Ringeisen v. Town of Forest
against the Town of Forest. Because we agree with the trial court that Ringeisen did not give notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10265 - 2005-03-31
against the Town of Forest. Because we agree with the trial court that Ringeisen did not give notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10265 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jermetrius J. Farmer
discretion of the trial court, and we will not reverse absent an erroneous exercise of sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20690 - 2005-12-19
discretion of the trial court, and we will not reverse absent an erroneous exercise of sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20690 - 2005-12-19
CA Blank Order
not possibly have drawn the appropriate inferences from the evidence adduced at trial. See State v. Poellinger
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31
not possibly have drawn the appropriate inferences from the evidence adduced at trial. See State v. Poellinger
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
One of the central issues at trial was how much Burke and Baumann agreed to pay Braizer if they ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30079 - 2014-09-15
One of the central issues at trial was how much Burke and Baumann agreed to pay Braizer if they ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rayna J. Bauer
of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5388 - 2017-09-19
of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a), as a second offense. Bauer claims that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5388 - 2017-09-19