Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32211 - 32220 of 76954 for judgment for u s.
Search results 32211 - 32220 of 76954 for judgment for u s.
State v. Ryan D.D.
a court’s unambiguous oral pronouncement of sentence and a written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12833 - 2005-03-31
a court’s unambiguous oral pronouncement of sentence and a written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12833 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vernon H. Walker
after we affirmed the judgment of conviction in Walker I. In Walker II, he raised the adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25837 - 2006-08-29
after we affirmed the judgment of conviction in Walker I. In Walker II, he raised the adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25837 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
provides “the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126124 - 2017-09-21
provides “the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on an issue of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126124 - 2017-09-21
Victoria A. Badzinski v. Merle Patnode
Patnode’s inspection report noted: “SOUTH[]WEST[] CORNER HAS OLD MOVEMENT THAT HAS STOP[PED] S[I]NCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4939 - 2005-03-31
Patnode’s inspection report noted: “SOUTH[]WEST[] CORNER HAS OLD MOVEMENT THAT HAS STOP[PED] S[I]NCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4939 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. Landrath
of the injury” and the harm must have resulted from “the natural consequence[s] of the actions.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5414 - 2017-09-19
of the injury” and the harm must have resulted from “the natural consequence[s] of the actions.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5414 - 2017-09-19
Chapter 11 - Regulation of Members of the State Bar
of administering s. 49.22. SCR 11.05 [Deleted.] SCR 11.06 Group or prepaid legal services plans. (1) A "group
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1083 - 2005-03-31
of administering s. 49.22. SCR 11.05 [Deleted.] SCR 11.06 Group or prepaid legal services plans. (1) A "group
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1083 - 2005-03-31
Battites Wesley v. Warden Marianne Cooke
or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and 4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14269 - 2005-03-31
or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and 4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14269 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. The trial court denied the motion and Gallion appealed to this court. We affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
discretion. The trial court denied the motion and Gallion appealed to this court. We affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Warren L. Brandt
subsequently wrote two letters to Attorney Brandt requesting his written response to T.K.'s grievance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16633 - 2017-09-21
subsequently wrote two letters to Attorney Brandt requesting his written response to T.K.'s grievance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16633 - 2017-09-21
Thomas L. Anderson v. State of Wisconsin Parole Commission
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7294 - 2005-03-31
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7294 - 2005-03-31