Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32211 - 32220 of 58381 for speedy trial.
Search results 32211 - 32220 of 58381 for speedy trial.
Steven A. Kofler v. Bradley R. Florence
Bradley R. Florence.[1] Kofler argues that the trial court erred by applying the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12708 - 2005-03-31
Bradley R. Florence.[1] Kofler argues that the trial court erred by applying the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12708 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene E.
of juvenile court jurisdiction is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. J.A.L. v. State, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13179 - 2005-03-31
of juvenile court jurisdiction is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. J.A.L. v. State, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13179 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
it does not appear that the trial court explicitly addressed John’s alternate theory, we can infer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54736 - 2010-09-22
it does not appear that the trial court explicitly addressed John’s alternate theory, we can infer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54736 - 2010-09-22
Brown County Human Services Department v. Kathy M.
. appeals orders terminating her parental rights to her children. Kathy argues the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6257 - 2005-03-31
. appeals orders terminating her parental rights to her children. Kathy argues the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he understood. When the court announced the date of Timothy’s TPR trial, Timothy notified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69106 - 2014-09-15
that he understood. When the court announced the date of Timothy’s TPR trial, Timothy notified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69106 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
alleged in the petition. ¶3 During the trial, Jennifer’s defense attorney elicited testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45696 - 2014-09-15
alleged in the petition. ¶3 During the trial, Jennifer’s defense attorney elicited testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45696 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a new trial. We concluded that the alleged new evidence was “not relevant” to the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650817 - 2023-05-02
to a new trial. We concluded that the alleged new evidence was “not relevant” to the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650817 - 2023-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Deborah A. Neas
to establish probable cause; and (2) the trial court erred in admitting financial records of her employer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11563 - 2017-09-19
to establish probable cause; and (2) the trial court erred in admitting financial records of her employer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11563 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
second habeas corpus petition because: (1) his ineffective assistance claims against trial counsel were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29971 - 2007-08-13
second habeas corpus petition because: (1) his ineffective assistance claims against trial counsel were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29971 - 2007-08-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties, “We’ll proceed to the merits right now.” Patterson & Richardson’s trial counsel responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731769 - 2023-11-22
the parties, “We’ll proceed to the merits right now.” Patterson & Richardson’s trial counsel responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731769 - 2023-11-22