Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32221 - 32230 of 37917 for d's.
Search results 32221 - 32230 of 37917 for d's.
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
. Wolfe, 2001 WI App 136, ¶37, 246 Wis. 2d 233, 631 N.W.2d 240, we determined that “[d]iagnoses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6140 - 2005-03-31
. Wolfe, 2001 WI App 136, ¶37, 246 Wis. 2d 233, 631 N.W.2d 240, we determined that “[d]iagnoses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: frank d. remington, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124906 - 2014-10-22
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: frank d. remington, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124906 - 2014-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. And then I will await the closing arguments, briefs, of the State[,] the [d]efense, and we’ll see you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610529 - 2023-02-09
. And then I will await the closing arguments, briefs, of the State[,] the [d]efense, and we’ll see you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610529 - 2023-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in question and that the data was accurately transmitted without any manipulation “reache[d] beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044665 - 2025-12-02
in question and that the data was accurately transmitted without any manipulation “reache[d] beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044665 - 2025-12-02
Mary Carolyn Iverson v. Robert Iverson
is classified as marital property under s. 766.63. (d) By a decree, marital property agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6263 - 2005-03-31
is classified as marital property under s. 766.63. (d) By a decree, marital property agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6263 - 2005-03-31
Jose-Manuel Raneda v. Bank of America, N.A.
. 2d 97, 109, 279 N.W.2d 493 (Ct. App. 1979) (unrefuted arguments deemed admitted). D. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5547 - 2005-03-31
. 2d 97, 109, 279 N.W.2d 493 (Ct. App. 1979) (unrefuted arguments deemed admitted). D. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5547 - 2005-03-31
State v. Laura K-T.
in a termination trial under the erroneous-exercise-of-discretion standard.” State v. Quinsanna D., 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6407 - 2005-03-31
in a termination trial under the erroneous-exercise-of-discretion standard.” State v. Quinsanna D., 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6407 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shelton Love
in its perpetration.” “[D]efendants may be found guilty of being concerned in the commission of a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13130 - 2005-03-31
in its perpetration.” “[D]efendants may be found guilty of being concerned in the commission of a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13130 - 2005-03-31
State v. Armando P. Rodriguez
sexual assault as a habitual offender, in violation of §§ 940.225(2)(d) and 939.62(2), Stats.; criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31
sexual assault as a habitual offender, in violation of §§ 940.225(2)(d) and 939.62(2), Stats.; criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith B.
, and the pertinent statute, § 940.225(1)(d), STATS., does not require proof of an exact date. Id. at 250, 426 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14225 - 2014-09-15
, and the pertinent statute, § 940.225(1)(d), STATS., does not require proof of an exact date. Id. at 250, 426 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14225 - 2014-09-15