Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32231 - 32240 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32231 - 32240 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 6. ¶4 Following his direct appeal, Robbins filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246958 - 2019-09-17
. Id. at 6. ¶4 Following his direct appeal, Robbins filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246958 - 2019-09-17
[PDF]
WI App 38
the circuit court erred by denying their postverdict motion to change the jury’s verdict finding them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190480 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court erred by denying their postverdict motion to change the jury’s verdict finding them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Barnes asserts he is entitled to dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346592 - 2021-03-16
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Barnes asserts he is entitled to dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346592 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Pacific summary judgment and by denying Nutt’s motion to compel discovery. We reject Nutt’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234218 - 2019-02-05
Pacific summary judgment and by denying Nutt’s motion to compel discovery. We reject Nutt’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234218 - 2019-02-05
State v. Roger I. Abrahams
. §§ 948.02(1) and 939.32 (1999-20000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4197 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 948.02(1) and 939.32 (1999-20000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
they attributed to the highway construction. The DOT brought a motion in limine to prevent the Yosts from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9562 - 2017-09-19
they attributed to the highway construction. The DOT brought a motion in limine to prevent the Yosts from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9562 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as well. 3 On July 9, 2020, LaCrosse filed a motion for a three-judge panel in appeal No. 2020AP1121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898233 - 2025-01-07
as well. 3 On July 9, 2020, LaCrosse filed a motion for a three-judge panel in appeal No. 2020AP1121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898233 - 2025-01-07
[PDF]
Synopsis of cases being heard in oral argument, March 2020
convictions, and that he was entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously denied his motion
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsmar2020.pdf - 2020-03-06
convictions, and that he was entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erroneously denied his motion
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsmar2020.pdf - 2020-03-06
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2013
of negligence. The city and Musson each filed cross-claims for indemnification, and they each filed motions
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93980 - 2014-09-15
of negligence. The city and Musson each filed cross-claims for indemnification, and they each filed motions
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Walter Lee Thomas
, and that K.O. related that incident to her sister the same day. Thomas’s trial counsel filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11162 - 2017-09-19
, and that K.O. related that incident to her sister the same day. Thomas’s trial counsel filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11162 - 2017-09-19