Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32241 - 32250 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 32241 - 32250 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125402 - 2005-04-29
constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125402 - 2005-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
failure to prove one prong of the test relieves the court of addressing the other. Strickland, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
failure to prove one prong of the test relieves the court of addressing the other. Strickland, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
Stores, Inc., 109 Wis. 2d 490, 493, 326 N.W.2d 240 (1982). “The test of finality is not what later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45004 - 2009-12-29
Stores, Inc., 109 Wis. 2d 490, 493, 326 N.W.2d 240 (1982). “The test of finality is not what later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45004 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
State v. Henry Bloomfield
, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), the United States Supreme Court established a two-pronged test to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5636 - 2017-09-19
, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), the United States Supreme Court established a two-pronged test to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the test is whether the officer ‘has a reasonable suspicion that a suspect may be armed.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15
, the test is whether the officer ‘has a reasonable suspicion that a suspect may be armed.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88774 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly M. Desimone
of the public generally. See id. at 198. That is an ultimate test of “reasonableness” which transcends form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19730 - 2017-09-21
of the public generally. See id. at 198. That is an ultimate test of “reasonableness” which transcends form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19730 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a citizen.” Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 n.16 (1968). The test is whether, under the totality
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187545 - 2017-09-21
of a citizen.” Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 n.16 (1968). The test is whether, under the totality
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187545 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a motion to suppress, the test for 4 Dawson argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105037 - 2017-09-21
of a motion to suppress, the test for 4 Dawson argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105037 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
test which asks, “Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6972 - 2014-06-25
test which asks, “Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6972 - 2014-06-25
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
test which asks, “Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2014-06-25
test which asks, “Under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2014-06-25