Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32251 - 32260 of 34004 for dismissal.

State v. Melvin R. Tucker
erred in denying his motion to dismiss the information based on multiplicity of counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7865 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s motion for declaratory judgment. The order dismissed State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122978 - 2014-10-02

COURT OF APPEALS
two conspiracy charges were dismissed. The court accepted Lucht’s stipulation, through his attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87554 - 2012-09-26

[PDF] WI APP 62
court granted a motion to dismiss on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence in part because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145272 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, cross-examined the State’s witnesses, and argued that the court should dismiss the TPR. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149793 - 2017-09-21

2008 WI APP 42
and 2004CF227. The trial court dismissed the five crimes charged in Case Nos. 2004CF634 and 2005CF462 after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31876 - 2008-03-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the State would recommend that the remaining charges be dismissed and read in. The parties agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563254 - 2022-09-07

[PDF] State v. Melvin R. Tucker
court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the information based on multiplicity of counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7864 - 2017-09-19

State v. Tronnie M. Dismuke
, and the other charge was dismissed and “read-in” for sentencing purposes. At his sentencing hearing, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15709 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
courts have interpreted this limitation to mean that dismissal requires that the non- complying party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350050 - 2021-04-05