Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32251 - 32260 of 60449 for two.
Search results 32251 - 32260 of 60449 for two.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court dismissed Tadisch’s petition on two grounds: (1) the matter had not been diligently prosecuted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136840 - 2017-09-21
court dismissed Tadisch’s petition on two grounds: (1) the matter had not been diligently prosecuted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136840 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, six months of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280190 - 2020-08-19
, six months of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280190 - 2020-08-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to the three-strikes law, when in fact it was a two-strikes crime because it was a serious child sex offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34662 - 2008-11-19
to the three-strikes law, when in fact it was a two-strikes crime because it was a serious child sex offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34662 - 2008-11-19
Jeannette I. Haddix v. Eloise Luckett
filed a forty-nine page brief in chief and a thirteen-page brief in reply to a two-page pro se brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13496 - 2005-03-31
filed a forty-nine page brief in chief and a thirteen-page brief in reply to a two-page pro se brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13496 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roy E. Ridener
. PER CURIAM. Roy Ridener appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of burglary, one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9598 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. Roy Ridener appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of burglary, one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9598 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In the event Attorney Goggin determined that this appeal was not moot, we directed him to address two issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524837 - 2022-05-24
. In the event Attorney Goggin determined that this appeal was not moot, we directed him to address two issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524837 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
State v. James E. Jones
affirm the sentence. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. (..continued) 2 There were two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11206 - 2017-09-19
affirm the sentence. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. (..continued) 2 There were two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11206 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Russell H. Farr
the recommended sentences. Two judgments of conviction for armed robbery were subsequently entered. The one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8000 - 2017-09-19
the recommended sentences. Two judgments of conviction for armed robbery were subsequently entered. The one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8000 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Garry P. Van de Voort
defective. Two counselors testified that Van de Voort was delusional, and four jail workers related his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15298 - 2017-09-21
defective. Two counselors testified that Van de Voort was delusional, and four jail workers related his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15298 - 2017-09-21
City of Sheboygan v. Jay A. Kraemer
-two (72) days after the date set for arraignment[.]” We conclude, however, that neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12062 - 2005-03-31
-two (72) days after the date set for arraignment[.]” We conclude, however, that neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12062 - 2005-03-31