Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32261 - 32270 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 32261 - 32270 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
. “[T]he test is not whether the method of service was reasonable or whether the agency was prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30428 - 2007-10-02
. “[T]he test is not whether the method of service was reasonable or whether the agency was prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30428 - 2007-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
need not address both prongs of the Strickland test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617542 - 2023-02-07
need not address both prongs of the Strickland test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617542 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Jackson D. Carpenter
. 2d 525, 543, 370 N.W.2d 222 (1985) (stating test for harmless error is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16060 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 525, 543, 370 N.W.2d 222 (1985) (stating test for harmless error is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16060 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that a confidential informant’s tip led to a search of Smith that revealed over $400 in cash that tested positive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98301 - 2014-09-15
that a confidential informant’s tip led to a search of Smith that revealed over $400 in cash that tested positive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98301 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gregory C. Royal v. Sara Seehafer
tests” that were “irrelevant to [his] claim and/or for reasons that were not based in fact or law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3203 - 2017-09-19
tests” that were “irrelevant to [his] claim and/or for reasons that were not based in fact or law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3203 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28030 - 2014-09-15
suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28030 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a common-sense, totality- of-the-circumstances test that asks, “[w]hat would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329390 - 2021-01-28
is a common-sense, totality- of-the-circumstances test that asks, “[w]hat would a reasonable police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329390 - 2021-01-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in his no-merit response that the blood test results could not be used against him because there were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240999 - 2019-06-11
in his no-merit response that the blood test results could not be used against him because there were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240999 - 2019-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and therefore the substantial factor test was met. ¶12 Craig argues that the court also erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173628 - 2017-09-21
and therefore the substantial factor test was met. ¶12 Craig argues that the court also erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173628 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
M&I Bank of Southern Wisconsin v. Robert F. Lins
. No. 03-2112 4 ¶7 While we agree that the Notte test is applicable here, Edith has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6751 - 2017-09-20
. No. 03-2112 4 ¶7 While we agree that the Notte test is applicable here, Edith has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6751 - 2017-09-20