Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32271 - 32280 of 38468 for t's.

State v. Walter W. Blanck Sr.
prejudice resulting from the passage of time between crime and arrest or charge. Id. at 322. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3562 - 2005-03-31

Joan I. Schwarz v. Dane County
)), where the supreme court observed that [t]he judge has been aware of the amount of time consumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14547 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, Dwayne F.’s argument that “[t]he onus for seeking a relative placement should always be on the Bureau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114109 - 2014-06-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be established for Rachael’s medical and educational expenses. The court stated, “[T]he same factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165670 - 2017-09-21

State v. Darryl Joe Brown
, stating: [T]he sniff discloses only the presence or absence of narcotics, a contraband item. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4666 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
: "[T]he petitioner never made an offer of proof or a request that she be qualified as an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12674 - 2005-03-31

State v. Harris D. Byers
with jurisdiction. [3] Wisconsin Stat. § 165.255 provides that "[t]he department of justice may, at the request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Deltar v. LIRC, 226 Wis. 2d 11, 21, 593 N.W.2d 908 (Ct. App. 1999) (“[T]he healing period is that period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40858 - 2009-09-14

Oneida County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
in circuit court. In fact, in its reply brief in circuit court, the county specifically stated: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2280 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that “there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction.” Id. at 674. “[T]here is no prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122846 - 2014-09-30