Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32291 - 32300 of 70363 for his.
Search results 32291 - 32300 of 70363 for his.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Teasdale argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Teasdale argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887928 - 2024-12-10
William J. Toman v. Pamela A. Polenz
modification specified that the father, William Toman, may not permit contact between his children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20634 - 2005-12-14
modification specified that the father, William Toman, may not permit contact between his children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20634 - 2005-12-14
[PDF]
from his residence. The issue in this appeal is whether the warrant’s authorization to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470042 - 2022-01-10
from his residence. The issue in this appeal is whether the warrant’s authorization to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470042 - 2022-01-10
James H. Cameron v. Jane P. Cameron
the terms of the divorce judgment, Cameron was to pay as child support the greater of 29% of his gross
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16988 - 2005-03-31
the terms of the divorce judgment, Cameron was to pay as child support the greater of 29% of his gross
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16988 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce T. Davis
Davis also appeals the order denying his postconviction motions. Davis argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21587 - 2017-09-21
Davis also appeals the order denying his postconviction motions. Davis argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21587 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, because they would not have been recoverable in a civil action against Kielb for his conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244808 - 2019-08-06
, because they would not have been recoverable in a civil action against Kielb for his conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244808 - 2019-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
) determined that the property division between David and his wife, Carmenza Campbell, would be a 50:50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30116 - 2007-09-04
) determined that the property division between David and his wife, Carmenza Campbell, would be a 50:50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30116 - 2007-09-04
State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
for admissibility of “other acts” evidence when the defendant seeks to use the evidence defensively to refute his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12489 - 2005-03-31
for admissibility of “other acts” evidence when the defendant seeks to use the evidence defensively to refute his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James D. Miller
court granted a new trial to psychologist James D. Miller on the grounds that his two trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26067 - 2017-09-21
court granted a new trial to psychologist James D. Miller on the grounds that his two trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26067 - 2017-09-21
State v. James D. Miller
James D. Miller on the grounds that his two trial counsel were ineffective. Miller had been convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26067 - 2006-08-01
James D. Miller on the grounds that his two trial counsel were ineffective. Miller had been convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26067 - 2006-08-01