Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 17414 for Cost.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 17414 for Cost.
[PDF]
Monthly Statistical Report - August 2019
the costs of this proceeding, which are $4,703.85 as of July 10, 2019. 08/22/2019
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249291 - 2019-10-24
the costs of this proceeding, which are $4,703.85 as of July 10, 2019. 08/22/2019
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249291 - 2019-10-24
Bockhorst v. David B. Kalan
frivolous claim costs of $2,450. Kalan moved to vacate the judgment. After a hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8435 - 2005-03-31
frivolous claim costs of $2,450. Kalan moved to vacate the judgment. After a hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David K. Kalan v. Bockhorst
to BEK attorney’s fees of $3,500. Kalan now appeals and BEK counters by requesting costs for pursuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14372 - 2014-09-15
to BEK attorney’s fees of $3,500. Kalan now appeals and BEK counters by requesting costs for pursuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14372 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Bockhorst v. David B. Kalan
judgment against Kalan and, additionally, granted the law firm frivolous claim costs of $2,450. Kalan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8435 - 2017-09-19
judgment against Kalan and, additionally, granted the law firm frivolous claim costs of $2,450. Kalan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8435 - 2017-09-19
Patrick T. Cowan v.
and notified his clients of the suspension and has not paid the costs of the proceeding. Prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16993 - 2005-03-31
and notified his clients of the suspension and has not paid the costs of the proceeding. Prior
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ pricing terms were “the best in the business … somewhere around dealer cost or below.” Rudis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110892 - 2017-09-21
’ pricing terms were “the best in the business … somewhere around dealer cost or below.” Rudis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110892 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
terms were “the best in the business … somewhere around dealer cost or below.” Rudis testified later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110892 - 2014-04-29
terms were “the best in the business … somewhere around dealer cost or below.” Rudis testified later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110892 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
Patrick T. Cowan v.
not paid the costs of the proceeding. Prior to that suspension, Attorney Cowan was twice disciplined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16993 - 2017-09-21
not paid the costs of the proceeding. Prior to that suspension, Attorney Cowan was twice disciplined
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16993 - 2017-09-21
Property Valuation Associates, Inc. v. Town and Country Supermarkets, Inc.
which, in PVA's own opinion, it does not feel it can successfully challenge. The cost incurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11444 - 2005-03-31
which, in PVA's own opinion, it does not feel it can successfully challenge. The cost incurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11444 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Keith E. Halverson
recommended that Attorney Halverson be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶9 We adopt
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17412 - 2017-09-21
recommended that Attorney Halverson be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶9 We adopt
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17412 - 2017-09-21