Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. David A. Morris
HOOVER, P.J.1 David Morris appeals the circuit court's order denying his motion for sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2329 - 2017-09-19
HOOVER, P.J.1 David Morris appeals the circuit court's order denying his motion for sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2329 - 2017-09-19
Laurie Ruth Rosin v. Lee Alan Scholtus
of physical placement of the parties' six-year-old son.[1] The order arising out of Lee's motion to hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11588 - 2005-03-31
of physical placement of the parties' six-year-old son.[1] The order arising out of Lee's motion to hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence E. Green
to explain how that sentence met the minimum custody standard. The trial court denied the motion. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21566 - 2017-09-21
to explain how that sentence met the minimum custody standard. The trial court denied the motion. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21566 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Laurie Ruth Rosin v. Lee Alan Scholtus
decisions made by a person having legal custody. Lee contends that because his motion did not seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11588 - 2017-09-19
decisions made by a person having legal custody. Lee contends that because his motion did not seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11588 - 2017-09-19
State v. David A. Morris
HOOVER, P.J.[1] David Morris appeals the circuit court's order denying his motion for sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31
HOOVER, P.J.[1] David Morris appeals the circuit court's order denying his motion for sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
of the property by virtue of its conversion into a joint tenancy. ¶14 Wisconsin Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
of the property by virtue of its conversion into a joint tenancy. ¶14 Wisconsin Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the denial of his motions to amend the complaint and to disqualify the judge. We reject Verdone’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118649 - 2014-07-30
the denial of his motions to amend the complaint and to disqualify the judge. We reject Verdone’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118649 - 2014-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motions to amend the complaint and to disqualify the judge. We reject Verdone’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118649 - 2014-09-15
motions to amend the complaint and to disqualify the judge. We reject Verdone’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118649 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of custody. The court recognized a standing objection and permitted the State to question Adams regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127635 - 2017-09-21
of custody. The court recognized a standing objection and permitted the State to question Adams regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127635 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
not have a witness from the state hygiene lab to testify as to the chain of custody. The court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127635 - 2014-11-10
not have a witness from the state hygiene lab to testify as to the chain of custody. The court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127635 - 2014-11-10