Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 13657 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 13657 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. As to the double jeopardy claim, it would be frivolous to argue on appeal that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
motion. As to the double jeopardy claim, it would be frivolous to argue on appeal that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because he was not entitled to “double credit.” Loging filed a notice of intent to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747296 - 2024-01-05
because he was not entitled to “double credit.” Loging filed a notice of intent to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747296 - 2024-01-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to challenge his conviction and sentence with the exception of a double jeopardy challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252983 - 2020-01-29
right to challenge his conviction and sentence with the exception of a double jeopardy challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252983 - 2020-01-29
Kathy Willis-Fulani v. Phil Kingston
.2d 627, 647, 492 N.W.2d 633, 642 (Ct. App. 1992). Willis-Fulani next argues that her double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11113 - 2005-03-31
.2d 627, 647, 492 N.W.2d 633, 642 (Ct. App. 1992). Willis-Fulani next argues that her double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11113 - 2005-03-31
Mark J. Santner v. Debbie Mitchell
it violated double jeopardy. Because the facts and circumstances under this case do not satisfy the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31
it violated double jeopardy. Because the facts and circumstances under this case do not satisfy the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jackie Green
is attempting to claim double credit, that he is not entitled to forty-one days’ credit and that Green “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16209 - 2017-09-21
is attempting to claim double credit, that he is not entitled to forty-one days’ credit and that Green “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16209 - 2017-09-21
Albert Winfrey v. Gordon A. Abrahamson
was in violation of Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.66(3) and violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8029 - 2005-03-31
was in violation of Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.66(3) and violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8029 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and postconviction order, rejecting Arthur’s claims of Double Jeopardy, insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35506 - 2009-02-09
of conviction and postconviction order, rejecting Arthur’s claims of Double Jeopardy, insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35506 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. As to the double jeopardy claim, it would be frivolous to argue on appeal that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
motion. As to the double jeopardy claim, it would be frivolous to argue on appeal that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
period constituted double jeopardy. The circuit denied the motion. Hudson appealed and we affirmed. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31051 - 2007-12-03
period constituted double jeopardy. The circuit denied the motion. Hudson appealed and we affirmed. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31051 - 2007-12-03