Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 3231 - 3240 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and health status, his sentence is a de facto life sentence, and he contends that imposing such a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18
and health status, his sentence is a de facto life sentence, and he contends that imposing such a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18
Milwaukee Precision Casting, Inc. v. Mark E. Hagedorn
to MPC’s cross-appeal, we decide the issues de novo and determine that prejudgment interest was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11245 - 2005-03-31
to MPC’s cross-appeal, we decide the issues de novo and determine that prejudgment interest was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
U.S. Oil Inc. v. City of Fond Du Lac
the state legislation preempt the City's tobacco ordinance. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8546 - 2017-09-19
the state legislation preempt the City's tobacco ordinance. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8546 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 162
judgments on the pleadings de novo as well. Helnore v. DNR, 2005 WI App 46, ¶2, 280 Wis. 2d 211, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41727 - 2014-09-15
judgments on the pleadings de novo as well. Helnore v. DNR, 2005 WI App 46, ¶2, 280 Wis. 2d 211, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41727 - 2014-09-15
Steven R. Stein v. State of Wisconsin Psychology Examining Board
pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5761 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment to Maple Valley.5 ¶19 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.6 Munger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955505 - 2025-06-25
judgment to Maple Valley.5 ¶19 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.6 Munger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955505 - 2025-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied the parties’ motions. John and Lori requested de novo review of the family court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213621 - 2018-05-31
commissioner denied the parties’ motions. John and Lori requested de novo review of the family court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213621 - 2018-05-31
2011 WI App 21
. Analysis. Summary Judgment Standard ¶16 We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58773 - 2011-02-15
. Analysis. Summary Judgment Standard ¶16 We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58773 - 2011-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Rhonda Spaulding
. As a result, the question becomes one that we review de novo. (Citations omitted.) Thus, we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3260 - 2017-09-19
. As a result, the question becomes one that we review de novo. (Citations omitted.) Thus, we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3260 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy M. Ziebart
to de novo review. Id. at 639. ¶17 Whether trial counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6312 - 2017-09-19
to de novo review. Id. at 639. ¶17 Whether trial counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6312 - 2017-09-19