Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32301 - 32310 of 75055 for judgment for us.

State v. James H. Oswald
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR., Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12412 - 2005-03-31

State v. James H. Oswald
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR., Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12698 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Wisconsin Education Association Council
of the Teachers’ petition on the pleadings. A motion for judgment on the pleadings is essentially a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18836 - 2017-09-21

Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Wisconsin Education Association Council
’ petition on the pleadings. A motion for judgment on the pleadings is essentially a motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18836 - 2005-08-30

[PDF] WI App 25
Health Institute in Madison because Mendota is also a “state treatment facility” as that term is used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185883 - 2018-02-13

Dodgeland Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
that it was the district’s “general expectation and teachers’ general practice” that preparation time was to be used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2208 - 2005-03-31

State v. Walter Leutenegger
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: angela b. bartell, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6066 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scott K. Fisher
17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Supreme Court APPEAL from a judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25165 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] The Third Branch, summer 2009
Wisconsin circuit courts using Consolidated Court Automation Programs (CCAP) case management. On May 1
/news/thirdbranch/docs/summer09.pdf - 2009-12-02

[PDF] WI App 61
and, some months later, moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the City’s motion, reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287941 - 2020-11-11