Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32311 - 32320 of 69007 for had.
Search results 32311 - 32320 of 69007 for had.
State v. Randall W. Edwards
also testified that he had touched her indecently on several occasions prior to that date. The jury
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11394 - 2006-12-18
also testified that he had touched her indecently on several occasions prior to that date. The jury
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11394 - 2006-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
and delivering a controlled substance.[1] He filed a postconviction motion asserting that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27
and delivering a controlled substance.[1] He filed a postconviction motion asserting that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and his speech was slightly slurred. When asked how much he had to drink, Batterman responded, “[N]ot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732306 - 2023-11-28
and his speech was slightly slurred. When asked how much he had to drink, Batterman responded, “[N]ot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732306 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
%) of the gross disposable military retired pay the Member would have received had the Member become eligible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
%) of the gross disposable military retired pay the Member would have received had the Member become eligible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
focused her testimony on the first statutory criterion, explaining that she believed Thorin had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262804 - 2020-06-02
focused her testimony on the first statutory criterion, explaining that she believed Thorin had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262804 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
Frontsheet
an attorney representing a claimant advised Attorney Creedy that the claimant had been improperly assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123952 - 2017-09-21
an attorney representing a claimant advised Attorney Creedy that the claimant had been improperly assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123952 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert K.
for the State and the guardian ad litem stated that they had conflicts for that week. Mr. K’s attorney remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7670 - 2005-03-31
for the State and the guardian ad litem stated that they had conflicts for that week. Mr. K’s attorney remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7670 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
detectives reported Harris had made. Harris argues that the evidence should be suppressed because his oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33867 - 2014-09-15
detectives reported Harris had made. Harris argues that the evidence should be suppressed because his oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33867 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. First, she argues that the property was a “residence premises” covered by the policy she had through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677088 - 2023-07-11
. First, she argues that the property was a “residence premises” covered by the policy she had through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677088 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
WI APP 68
Worker’s Compensation Act (the “Act”) because Adam, who had previously filed a worker’s compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63069 - 2014-09-15
Worker’s Compensation Act (the “Act”) because Adam, who had previously filed a worker’s compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63069 - 2014-09-15