Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 91618 for 1.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 91618 for 1.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mills filed a response to the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186539 - 2017-09-21
), 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mills filed a response to the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186539 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Oregon v. Frank P. Sauer
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15748 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15748 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. RULE 809.32 (2011-12),1 concluding no grounds exist to challenge Behrensprung’s conviction for party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
. RULE 809.32 (2011-12),1 concluding no grounds exist to challenge Behrensprung’s conviction for party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Bayfield County: JOHN P. ANDERSON, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.1 Curtis Deering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27295 - 2014-09-15
court for Bayfield County: JOHN P. ANDERSON, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.1 Curtis Deering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27295 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2007 David R. Schanker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28835 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2007 David R. Schanker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28835 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robin J. Glindinning v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
and remanded with directions. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Labor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15538 - 2017-09-21
and remanded with directions. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Labor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15538 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501423 - 2022-03-31
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501423 - 2022-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: Daniel L. Konkol, Judge.[1] Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Brian E. Davis appeals, pro se, an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
: Daniel L. Konkol, Judge.[1] Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Brian E. Davis appeals, pro se, an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. woldt, Judge. Order reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] John Daggett appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28905 - 2007-05-08
. woldt, Judge. Order reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] John Daggett appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28905 - 2007-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Maurice Harris, pro se, appeals judgments convicting him of felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Maurice Harris, pro se, appeals judgments convicting him of felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19