Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 91568 for 1.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 91568 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Sonja Blake appeals an order denying her claim for a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142983 - 2015-06-10
, and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Sonja Blake appeals an order denying her claim for a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142983 - 2015-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Steven Maxson appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105556 - 2013-12-11
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Steven Maxson appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105556 - 2013-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Dykman, Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ruven Seibert appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29513 - 2007-06-27
. Before Dykman, Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ruven Seibert appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29513 - 2007-06-27
CA Blank Order
to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Schneider received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131566 - 2014-12-16
to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Schneider received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131566 - 2014-12-16
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
. Daniel Peterson appeals his conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary to § 946.41(1), Stats. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
. Daniel Peterson appeals his conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary to § 946.41(1), Stats. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Higginbotham, P.J., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Juan Orengo appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35444 - 2009-02-04
Higginbotham, P.J., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Juan Orengo appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35444 - 2009-02-04
State v. Armando Salinas
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Armando Salinas appeals from the judgments of conviction entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2005-03-31
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Armando Salinas appeals from the judgments of conviction entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Elsie Boltz v. Elmer Boltz
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10053 - 2017-09-19
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10053 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Robert E. Ryan
that the trial be rescheduled. Counsel reiterated this request at a status conference held on December 1, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14915 - 2017-09-21
that the trial be rescheduled. Counsel reiterated this request at a status conference held on December 1, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14915 - 2017-09-21
Rule Order
examination.[1] The court conducted a public hearing on the petition on Wednesday, May 16, 2012. BBE
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84599 - 2012-07-04
examination.[1] The court conducted a public hearing on the petition on Wednesday, May 16, 2012. BBE
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84599 - 2012-07-04