Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 83513 for case code.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 83513 for case code.
[PDF]
WI App 17
2018 WI App 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2016AP1521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209001 - 2018-04-09
2018 WI App 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2016AP1521
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209001 - 2018-04-09
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
2000 WI 82 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-2746-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17436 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI 82 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-2746-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17436 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Susan P. S.
2006 WI APP 100 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2005AP3155
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24948 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 100 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2005AP3155
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24948 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the entry of the proper judgment or remit the case to the trial court for entry of the proper judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111593 - 2014-05-05
the entry of the proper judgment or remit the case to the trial court for entry of the proper judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111593 - 2014-05-05
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2020 WI 52 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2364-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263253 - 2020-07-20
2020 WI 52 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2017AP2364-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263253 - 2020-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of an individual’s personal effects be reasonable. Under the facts of this case, we conclude that law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043058 - 2025-11-25
of an individual’s personal effects be reasonable. Under the facts of this case, we conclude that law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043058 - 2025-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
] Neither party disputes that the delay in this case was presumptively prejudicial. We turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81728 - 2012-04-30
] Neither party disputes that the delay in this case was presumptively prejudicial. We turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81728 - 2012-04-30
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3524 Complete Title of Case: In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17329 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-3524 Complete Title of Case: In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17329 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. There’s no dispute in this case that the judge did find that there was domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143972 - 2015-07-06
. There’s no dispute in this case that the judge did find that there was domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143972 - 2015-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that “there is not a reasonable probability that a different outcome would occur in this case” regardless of the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68894 - 2011-08-01
that “there is not a reasonable probability that a different outcome would occur in this case” regardless of the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68894 - 2011-08-01