Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 97715 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 97715 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
the other evidence in the case pointing to Thomas’ guilt, the court did not find that Teas’ testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
the other evidence in the case pointing to Thomas’ guilt, the court did not find that Teas’ testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
(1997) (appellate courts should decide cases on narrowest possible grounds). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55519 - 2010-10-12
(1997) (appellate courts should decide cases on narrowest possible grounds). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55519 - 2010-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS
The case was first heard in the municipal court, which denied Weinstein’s initial motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34265 - 2008-10-08
The case was first heard in the municipal court, which denied Weinstein’s initial motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34265 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
criminal case. We will not discuss that portion of the postconviction motion or the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125288 - 2014-10-27
criminal case. We will not discuss that portion of the postconviction motion or the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125288 - 2014-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 22, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34361 - 2008-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 22, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34361 - 2008-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36143 - 2009-04-13
in this case. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36143 - 2009-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
)). The focus in this case is on the mandate for public availability of court records under § 59.20(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142503 - 2015-05-27
)). The focus in this case is on the mandate for public availability of court records under § 59.20(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142503 - 2015-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. Bangert and subsequent cases set forth the duties a circuit court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116663 - 2014-07-14
Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. Bangert and subsequent cases set forth the duties a circuit court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116663 - 2014-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 24, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135532 - 2015-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 24, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135532 - 2015-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 19, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 19, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14