Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 63531 for records/1000.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 63531 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the filing of the no- merit report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113093 - 2017-09-21
to the filing of the no- merit report. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113093 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ryan Fontecchio
, consolidated the instant file (#97-CM-1804) with another file (#97-CM-1594) and although the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15658 - 2005-03-31
, consolidated the instant file (#97-CM-1804) with another file (#97-CM-1594) and although the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15658 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110006 - 2014-04-03
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110006 - 2014-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12720 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245252 - 2019-08-21
and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245252 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of justice. After review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
of justice. After review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Saffold could raise on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214069 - 2018-06-07
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Saffold could raise on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214069 - 2018-06-07
[PDF]
State v. James F. Emerich
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15