Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At trial, the two teenaged girls testified that Wilfert’s van initially passed them, but then backed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78157 - 2014-09-15
. At trial, the two teenaged girls testified that Wilfert’s van initially passed them, but then backed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78157 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of $1,696.50, with costs, following a bench trial, to Beau Serchen and Jena Nelson (hereafter “the couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04
of $1,696.50, with costs, following a bench trial, to Beau Serchen and Jena Nelson (hereafter “the couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04
James F. Karls v. David P. Geraghty
a dangerous weapon. Walsh was the victim of this crime. The criminal trial was scheduled to begin, but Karls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12666 - 2005-03-31
a dangerous weapon. Walsh was the victim of this crime. The criminal trial was scheduled to begin, but Karls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randall McConochie
, a trial was scheduled for October 13, 1998, and notice was mailed to McConochie at the address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2371 - 2017-09-19
, a trial was scheduled for October 13, 1998, and notice was mailed to McConochie at the address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2371 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel J. Wideman
. Affirmed. ANDERSON, P.J. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8828 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. ANDERSON, P.J. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8828 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
alleged in the petition. ¶3 During the trial, Jennifer’s defense attorney elicited testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45696 - 2014-09-15
alleged in the petition. ¶3 During the trial, Jennifer’s defense attorney elicited testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45696 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that his trial and postconviction lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation. He argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125348 - 2014-10-27
that his trial and postconviction lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation. He argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125348 - 2014-10-27
Ellen Marie Fischer v. Michael Peter Fischer
old at the time of trial. Ellen had another child, Kyle, by a previous marriage. The couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15177 - 2005-03-31
old at the time of trial. Ellen had another child, Kyle, by a previous marriage. The couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15177 - 2005-03-31
Steven A. Kofler v. Bradley R. Florence
Bradley R. Florence.[1] Kofler argues that the trial court erred by applying the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12708 - 2005-03-31
Bradley R. Florence.[1] Kofler argues that the trial court erred by applying the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12708 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brett A. Brobeck
to the habitual criminality enhancer.3 The trial court ruled that Brobeck understood that he pleaded guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13980 - 2014-09-15
to the habitual criminality enhancer.3 The trial court ruled that Brobeck understood that he pleaded guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13980 - 2014-09-15