Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 32321 - 32330 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Brown County Human Services Department v. Kathy M.
. appeals orders terminating her parental rights to her children. Kathy argues the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6257 - 2005-03-31
. appeals orders terminating her parental rights to her children. Kathy argues the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Deborah A. Neas
to establish probable cause; and (2) the trial court erred in admitting financial records of her employer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11563 - 2017-09-19
to establish probable cause; and (2) the trial court erred in admitting financial records of her employer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11563 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
along with an agreed-upon “cap deal,” he would not have pled but would have opted to go to trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93373 - 2013-02-26
along with an agreed-upon “cap deal,” he would not have pled but would have opted to go to trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93373 - 2013-02-26
State v. Wells Oswalt
the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10769 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10769 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mylea Wirkus
of the breathalyzer test result. We uphold the trial court’s denial of Wirkus’ motion to suppress. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
of the breathalyzer test result. We uphold the trial court’s denial of Wirkus’ motion to suppress. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Jody L. Stehle
to the maximum penalty of more than 100 years in prison and over $100,000 in fines. The trial court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12389 - 2017-09-21
to the maximum penalty of more than 100 years in prison and over $100,000 in fines. The trial court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
). Pierstorff moved the trial court to suppress all testimony and evidence gathered as a result of her arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12354 - 2017-09-21
). Pierstorff moved the trial court to suppress all testimony and evidence gathered as a result of her arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12354 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
second habeas corpus petition because: (1) his ineffective assistance claims against trial counsel were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29971 - 2007-08-13
second habeas corpus petition because: (1) his ineffective assistance claims against trial counsel were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29971 - 2007-08-13
[PDF]
Deborah Martin-Semrow v. Marc Raymond Semrow
that Wettersten be paid out of those funds. The trial court granted Wettersten’s motion, relying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13612 - 2017-09-21
that Wettersten be paid out of those funds. The trial court granted Wettersten’s motion, relying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of an order that denied his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149291 - 2017-09-21
of an order that denied his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149291 - 2017-09-21