Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32331 - 32340 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32331 - 32340 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Walter Szymanski
court order denying his postconviction motion. Szymanski requested resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9989 - 2017-09-19
court order denying his postconviction motion. Szymanski requested resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9989 - 2017-09-19
IW Enterprises v. Ronald A. Kopas
motion. It argues the circuit court erroneously concluded that there were questions of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6721 - 2005-03-31
motion. It argues the circuit court erroneously concluded that there were questions of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6721 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc.
conducted pretrial discovery for nearly two years. Then, on December 29, 1994, Brave filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9292 - 2017-09-19
conducted pretrial discovery for nearly two years. Then, on December 29, 1994, Brave filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9292 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kristina L. Vogt
)(a), 939.63(1)(a)2. and 939.05 (2001-02), 1 and from an order denying her postconviction motion. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6663 - 2017-09-20
)(a), 939.63(1)(a)2. and 939.05 (2001-02), 1 and from an order denying her postconviction motion. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6663 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. George Taylor
the post-commitment motions. No. 98-1030 2 Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
the post-commitment motions. No. 98-1030 2 Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Janice E. Rutan v. Sandra Kay Miller
filed for default judgment. At the November 8 hearing on Miller’s and Rutan’s cross-motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12128 - 2017-09-21
filed for default judgment. At the November 8 hearing on Miller’s and Rutan’s cross-motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12128 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert V. LaCombe v. Aurora Medical Group, Inc.
postverdict motion for a new trial. He claims that the jury’s verdict was inconsistent because the special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6743 - 2017-09-20
postverdict motion for a new trial. He claims that the jury’s verdict was inconsistent because the special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6743 - 2017-09-20
Darrel Alix v. Badger Mining Corporation
to the foundry. ¶5 In separate motions, the defendants moved for summary judgment arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4783 - 2005-03-31
to the foundry. ¶5 In separate motions, the defendants moved for summary judgment arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4783 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
-12)[1] and an order denying his postconviction motion seeking resentencing. Tucker’s appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16
-12)[1] and an order denying his postconviction motion seeking resentencing. Tucker’s appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2013-14) 1 postconviction motion for a new trial on grounds including ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153068 - 2017-09-21
(2013-14) 1 postconviction motion for a new trial on grounds including ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153068 - 2017-09-21