Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32331 - 32340 of 64166 for records.
Search results 32331 - 32340 of 64166 for records.
Borisav Petrovic v. gica Petrovic
exercise of discretion will not be found if the record shows that the trial court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9981 - 2007-01-18
exercise of discretion will not be found if the record shows that the trial court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9981 - 2007-01-18
State v. Alphonso Hubanks
facts that would support an argument that the lineup was suggestive. In addition, the record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13266 - 2015-05-11
facts that would support an argument that the lineup was suggestive. In addition, the record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13266 - 2015-05-11
Gary and Lisa Marifke v. Aluminum Industries Corp.
. In the interim, as reflected in the record, discovery efforts constituting gargantuan proportions took place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2015-05-11
. In the interim, as reflected in the record, discovery efforts constituting gargantuan proportions took place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2015-05-11
2010 WI APP 161
is required to demonstrate on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56896 - 2010-09-08
is required to demonstrate on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56896 - 2010-09-08
State v. Donald G. Kester
its discretion in accordance with acceptable legal standards and the facts of record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2014-06-24
its discretion in accordance with acceptable legal standards and the facts of record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2014-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
-revocation record does not reflect the sentencing judge’s awareness of the information in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2005-06-30
-revocation record does not reflect the sentencing judge’s awareness of the information in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2005-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
repeatedly. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (1)(e) (requiring appropriate references to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-27
repeatedly. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (1)(e) (requiring appropriate references to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-27
[PDF]
WI 126
the referee's report and recommendation. ¶2 After independently reviewing the record, we determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30663 - 2014-09-15
the referee's report and recommendation. ¶2 After independently reviewing the record, we determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30663 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Furthermore, there is nothing in the record to suggest that the resolution of defense counsel’s motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072902 - 2026-02-03
. Furthermore, there is nothing in the record to suggest that the resolution of defense counsel’s motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072902 - 2026-02-03
Frontsheet
the record, we determine that the facts as found by the referee demonstrate violations of the Rules
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30663 - 2007-10-17
the record, we determine that the facts as found by the referee demonstrate violations of the Rules
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30663 - 2007-10-17