Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32331 - 32340 of 58492 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
that he understood. When the court announced the date of Timothy’s TPR trial, Timothy notified the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69106 - 2006-01-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that his trial and postconviction lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation. He argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125348 - 2014-10-27

[PDF] Village of Pleasant Prairie v. Maureen M. McCarragher
content (PAC), first offense. 2 McCarragher argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5989 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the appropriate inferences from the evidence adduced at trial. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493, 507
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109725 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Justin P. Brandl
further challenges were more appropriate for trial, not a suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26040 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Upon our independent review of the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30

Capital City Sheet MInc., v. Marta Voytovich
a decision on the motion and the case proceeded to trial. After hearing the evidence, the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12562 - 2005-03-31

State v. Pervis Merritt
the question of withdrawal of a plea is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. State v. Rock, 92 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randall McConochie
on July 31, 1998. Upon receipt of the not guilty pleas, a trial was scheduled for October 13, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31

Four Seasons FS, Inc. v. Glen Mohn
., raises two issues on appeal.[1] First, it contends that the trial court erred by affirming the jury's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12993 - 2005-03-31