Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32331 - 32340 of 58267 for speedy trial.

Jessie L. McShan v. Jerry E. Smith, Jr.
in this proceeding. We affirm the trial court’s holding that it does not. ¶2 McShan is serving an eighteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4406 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David McIlquham v. County of Chippewa Board of Adjustment
. ¶2 The parties submitted this matter to the trial court on stipulated facts. The key facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3079 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was convicted of four different felony offenses following a jury trial in Jackson County. State v. Thums
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709581 - 2023-10-04

[PDF] Durand Cooperatives v. Dennis Emmert
was heard in small claims court, and the court held for Durand. Specifically, the trial court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12417 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
that the No. 95-3404 -2- appellants' statement of the case mixes numerous trial court cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10083 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Raymond Tomczyk v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
it was not. In the context of remanding for the trial court to award costs, we noted that courts applying the WEAJA “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14032 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or defect (NGI) for a sex offender registry violation. He argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68248 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Dwan L. Schuck
before asking her to submit to the test, instead of after, the trial court ruled that she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13876 - 2014-09-15

State v. Sukhbinder Singh
, and, as an included argument, contends that the trial court erred: 1) in not granting his motions to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4266 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
disciplinary decision. He argues error in the administrative proceeding, and in the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23