Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32341 - 32350 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Justin P. Brandl
further challenges were more appropriate for trial, not a suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26040 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph H. Savage
that bindover was improper on two of the counts, and therefore reverse the trial court’s order in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19274 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of Wauwatosa v. William J. Morgan
.1 William J. Morgan, pro se, appeals from the trial court judgment finding him guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13540 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Sauk County Department of Human Services v. Jody L. C.-P.
and affirm the order of the trial court. FACTS ¶2 In 1999, Jody’s children were found to be in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7083 - 2017-09-20

Town of Wautoma v. City of Wautoma
clerk or the Wautoma town clerk, as required by statute. The trial court upheld the ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. Upon our independent review of the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30

Ellen Marie Fischer v. Michael Peter Fischer
old at the time of trial. Ellen had another child, Kyle, by a previous marriage. The couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15177 - 2014-12-04

CA Blank Order
not possibly have drawn the appropriate inferences from the evidence adduced at trial. See State v. Poellinger
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31

Paul Ringeisen v. Town of Forest
against the Town of Forest. Because we agree with the trial court that Ringeisen did not give notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10265 - 2011-01-30

State v. Pervis Merritt
the question of withdrawal of a plea is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. State v. Rock, 92 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9907 - 2005-03-31