Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32351 - 32360 of 53069 for address.
Search results 32351 - 32360 of 53069 for address.
State v. Janelle L.I.
. Petitions to waive juvenile jurisdiction are addressed to circuit court discretion. In re P.A.K., 119 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15212 - 2005-06-12
. Petitions to waive juvenile jurisdiction are addressed to circuit court discretion. In re P.A.K., 119 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15212 - 2005-06-12
State v. James P.F.
addresses the determination of indigency and appointment of counsel. Pultz, 206 Wis.2d at 123, 556 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12873 - 2007-02-20
addresses the determination of indigency and appointment of counsel. Pultz, 206 Wis.2d at 123, 556 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12873 - 2007-02-20
CA Blank Order
addresses whether Ferrer’s plea was freely, voluntarily, and knowingly entered, and whether his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98214 - 2013-06-18
addresses whether Ferrer’s plea was freely, voluntarily, and knowingly entered, and whether his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98214 - 2013-06-18
Wallace A. Stellrecht v. Donald W. Gudmanson
was extremely important to Stellrecht’s theory of defense and that Williams was ineffective for not addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2499 - 2005-03-31
was extremely important to Stellrecht’s theory of defense and that Williams was ineffective for not addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2499 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to address the other grounds for reversal argued by State Farm. By the Court.—Judgment reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34264 - 2008-10-08
to address the other grounds for reversal argued by State Farm. By the Court.—Judgment reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34264 - 2008-10-08
CA Blank Order
and the public. [4] To the extent we have not addressed an argument raised by CESD on appeal, the argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129272 - 2014-05-14
and the public. [4] To the extent we have not addressed an argument raised by CESD on appeal, the argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129272 - 2014-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
fails to address this issue. ¶6 The circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85663 - 2015-05-26
fails to address this issue. ¶6 The circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85663 - 2015-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
claim for relief. Others were addressed on appeal, at which time the guilty plea hearing was under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102941 - 2005-03-31
claim for relief. Others were addressed on appeal, at which time the guilty plea hearing was under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102941 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
special needs that had not been addressed by their parents, and Shatasha’s own “extreme special needs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
special needs that had not been addressed by their parents, and Shatasha’s own “extreme special needs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
State v. Jerry L. Cox
sentence. After an evidentiary hearing, the court denied the motion. The no merit report addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13644 - 2005-03-31
sentence. After an evidentiary hearing, the court denied the motion. The no merit report addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13644 - 2005-03-31