Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32351 - 32360 of 43330 for legal seperation.

COURT OF APPEALS
or legal errors in the trial court’s decision. ¶12 With respect to subjective bias, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06

City of Prescott v. Gary Holmgren
of statute. Once a public highway has been legally established, it can only be terminated in the manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25960 - 2006-08-29

David J. Gehl v. Peter Conrad
] The history of administrative and legal action regarding Gehl’s 2001 application is more extensive than we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26120 - 2006-08-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
)). ¶9 Because McKeown fails to develop sufficient legal arguments as to why the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829611 - 2024-07-24

[PDF] County of Walworth v. Patrick Wolf
the suspect’s activity is legal or illegal.... We conclude that if any reasonable suspicion of past, present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Plover v. Scott K. Pittman
the facts, applied the proper legal No. 01-0974 5 standard, and used a demonstrated rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3828 - 2017-09-20

State v. Britten A.B.
recantation was not. Britten offers no factual or legal basis on which this court could reject the reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5297 - 2005-03-31

Scott Mullen v. Gerald VandeVoort
discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5589 - 2010-10-04

City of Sun Prairie v. Lance A. Rodenkirch
or exclude evidence if the circuit court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5390 - 2005-03-31

County of Jefferson v. James I. Krause
complains that the failure to clarify the legal distinction between PBT and Intoxilyzer tests is akin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5479 - 2011-03-03