Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32351 - 32360 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the manifest injustice test, ‘the issue is no longer whether the … plea should have been accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214325 - 2018-06-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and testing of a 2012 DNA sample from Dixon; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560077 - 2022-08-30

COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint.” Watts v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147292 - 2015-08-30

Lee Roberts v. Norman Jennings
. Wisconsin Bingo Control Bd., 88 Wis.2d 293, 301, 276 N.W.2d 716, 719 (1979). The test for determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9482 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on forfeiture by wrongdoing. “[T]he ‘manifest injustice’ test is met if the defendant was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467402 - 2021-12-28

[PDF] State v. George S. Tulley
(1997). The test for deficient performance is whether counsel’s representation fell below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3263 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint.” Watts v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147292 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Sarah Flint v. Barbara A. O'Connell, M.D.
. Flint subsequently informed O’Connell that she had had a positive pregnancy test and that she wished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3845 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Ellis H.
one ten day secured detention for these two events. (3) He alleged that Ellis had tested positive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7080 - 2017-09-20

Department of Revenue v. Johnson Welding & Manufacturing Company, Inc.
with Johnson that it is not more reasonable to adopt the department’s proposed “facts and circumstances” test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15989 - 2005-03-31