Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32351 - 32360 of 63531 for records/1000.
Search results 32351 - 32360 of 63531 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Rudolph D. Spears
a misuse of discretion, a defendant must show that the record contains an unreasonable or unjustifiable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25356 - 2017-09-21
a misuse of discretion, a defendant must show that the record contains an unreasonable or unjustifiable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25356 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2015AP1576-CRNM 2 so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157377 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP1576-CRNM 2 so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157377 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the transaction and did not think he had any records of it. On the day of trial, however, in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04
the transaction and did not think he had any records of it. On the day of trial, however, in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record and, most importantly, our supreme court’s decision in Skindzelewski v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367598 - 2021-05-19
review of the briefs and record and, most importantly, our supreme court’s decision in Skindzelewski v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367598 - 2021-05-19
CA Blank Order
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged three grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
found that Brophy was not indigent and entered its finding in the record the same day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15
found that Brophy was not indigent and entered its finding in the record the same day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Peter Bekersky
on the determination that Bekersky had not consistently asserted his innocence to counsel, and that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
on the determination that Bekersky had not consistently asserted his innocence to counsel, and that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Zei
postconviction testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3293 - 2017-09-19
postconviction testimony contained no justification for that withdrawal. The record as a whole, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3293 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240983 - 2019-05-20
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240983 - 2019-05-20
State v. Wua Xiong
on the victim, and Xiong’s record of committing prior, serious offenses, and his failure to benefit from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31
on the victim, and Xiong’s record of committing prior, serious offenses, and his failure to benefit from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31