Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32361 - 32370 of 91512 for 1.
Search results 32361 - 32370 of 91512 for 1.
Patricia A. M. v. Patricia S.
and cause remanded with directions. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16184 - 2005-03-31
and cause remanded with directions. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16184 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl Mitchell
guilty to burglary, party to a crime, in violation of §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.05, Stats. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
guilty to burglary, party to a crime, in violation of §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.05, Stats. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
Renee J. Stibbe v. Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
argue: (1) the verdict is perverse because it is inconsistent and reflects the jury’s failure to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13901 - 2005-03-31
argue: (1) the verdict is perverse because it is inconsistent and reflects the jury’s failure to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13901 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: kevin e. martens, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26
: kevin e. martens, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm. “The trial court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149115 - 2017-09-21
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We summarily affirm. “The trial court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149115 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chad Peter Hoffstatter
., Dykman and Vergeront, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Chad Hoffstatter appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6173 - 2005-03-31
., Dykman and Vergeront, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Chad Hoffstatter appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6173 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terri L. Boortz
intoxicated, first offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Boortz contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12690 - 2008-09-15
intoxicated, first offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] On appeal, Boortz contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12690 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
: timothy g. dugan, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Fine, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31475 - 2014-08-11
: timothy g. dugan, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Fine, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31475 - 2014-08-11
May a judge testify at a Canadian administrative tribunal hearing on behalf of an interest group which seeks a binding administrative rule declaring that the Canadian Human Rights Act applies to the Canadian judiciary?
The committee concludes that the issue involves the provisions of SCR 60.03(2), and SCR 60.05(1), (2) and (3
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=876 - 2005-03-31
The committee concludes that the issue involves the provisions of SCR 60.03(2), and SCR 60.05(1), (2) and (3
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=876 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten, and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138824 - 2015-04-01
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten, and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138824 - 2015-04-01