Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32361 - 32370 of 43810 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Penyedia Kitchen Set Kayu Jati Sewon Bantul.
Search results 32361 - 32370 of 43810 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Penyedia Kitchen Set Kayu Jati Sewon Bantul.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
that there is a new factor justifying a motion to modify a sentence. Id. A new factor is a fact or set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4658 - 2017-09-19
that there is a new factor justifying a motion to modify a sentence. Id. A new factor is a fact or set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4658 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
would constitute a new sentencing factor. ¶17 A new sentencing factor is a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235352 - 2019-02-20
would constitute a new sentencing factor. ¶17 A new sentencing factor is a fact or set of facts highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235352 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Neil Montoto
of WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(a) to an undisputed set of facts, and is reviewed independently. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5371 - 2017-09-19
of WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(a) to an undisputed set of facts, and is reviewed independently. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5371 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
set forth below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On December 12, 2015, the State charged Harris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
set forth below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On December 12, 2015, the State charged Harris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. Based on the directives set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26
, appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. Based on the directives set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883007 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the requirements set forth in WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶35, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
with the requirements set forth in WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶35, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the requirements set forth in WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶35, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
with the requirements set forth in WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶35, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the standard sentencing factors and explained their application in accordance with the framework set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96730 - 2014-09-15
the standard sentencing factors and explained their application in accordance with the framework set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96730 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal Nos. 2011AP2424-CR
2012AP918 4 set forth in Waller.2 Vanness, 304 Wis. 2d 692, ¶9. The second exception is where
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89987 - 2014-09-15
2012AP918 4 set forth in Waller.2 Vanness, 304 Wis. 2d 692, ¶9. The second exception is where
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89987 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of fact based on testimony at a hearing, and the reasoning for the court’s decision is set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06
of fact based on testimony at a hearing, and the reasoning for the court’s decision is set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06