Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32361 - 32370 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] WI App 61
language appears.” Id., ¶46. “Therefore, statutory language is interpreted in the context in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714113 - 2023-12-19

[PDF] WI APP 21
an offense. Id. at 367. In the decades since that holding, few Wisconsin appellate cases have further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511924 - 2022-06-08

[PDF] State v. Shannon Buettner
, the appellate court is not bound by inferences drawn therefrom by the trial court." Id. at 510, 143 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11825 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Mark Inglin
attempted anal or genital intrusion. See id. at 151, 577 N.W.2d at 818. Reiterating the basis for its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13173 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI App 207
; that is, the meaning a reasonable person would understand the words to mean. Id., ¶¶13-14. ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26382 - 2006-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). There, the defendant was convicted of burglary and theft. Id. at 207. The defendant, who had been convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836425 - 2024-08-08

WI App 52 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1458 Complete Title of...
of the statute. Id., ¶45. We give statutory language its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110214 - 2014-05-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous.” Id. Such factual findings will be upheld as long as they are supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238298 - 2019-04-02

Brian Hart v. Kenneth Bennet
the defendant’s submissions to determine whether they establish a prima facie defense to the claim. Id., ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5842 - 2005-03-31

George Burnett v. Dawn Alt
the proper standard of law. Id. However, to determine whether the circuit court applied the proper standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17184 - 2005-03-31