Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32371 - 32380 of 91533 for 1.
Search results 32371 - 32380 of 91533 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
a. hansher, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29839 - 2005-03-31
a. hansher, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29839 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clark J. Neklewicz
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The State appeals an amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17986 - 2005-03-31
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The State appeals an amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17986 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
. Daniel Peterson appeals his conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary to § 946.41(1), Stats. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
. Daniel Peterson appeals his conviction for obstructing an officer, contrary to § 946.41(1), Stats. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm and remand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907070 - 2025-01-29
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm and remand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907070 - 2025-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
Higginbotham, P.J., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Juan Orengo appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35444 - 2009-02-04
Higginbotham, P.J., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Juan Orengo appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35444 - 2009-02-04
State v. Michael J. Parent
) and 967.02(7).[1] The trial court asked Parent to explain his need to see the PSI and requested a response
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2006-04-24
) and 967.02(7).[1] The trial court asked Parent to explain his need to see the PSI and requested a response
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2006-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. ramirez, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
. ramirez, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This appeal arises from an action brought by Bank of America, N.A. (BANA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242737 - 2019-06-25
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This appeal arises from an action brought by Bank of America, N.A. (BANA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242737 - 2019-06-25
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
victim under the statutes or under article 1, section 9m of the Wisconsin Constitution," confers
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594784 - 2022-11-23
victim under the statutes or under article 1, section 9m of the Wisconsin Constitution," confers
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594784 - 2022-11-23
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added November 2017 oral argument dates
of Wis. Stat. § 799.01(1). Whether Wis. Stat. § 895.446(3) allows for recovery of attorney’s fees
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196509 - 2017-09-21
of Wis. Stat. § 799.01(1). Whether Wis. Stat. § 895.446(3) allows for recovery of attorney’s fees
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196509 - 2017-09-21