Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32371 - 32380 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 32371 - 32380 of 58500 for speedy trial.
State v. Anthony M. Patterson
for marijuana possession, for nonaffixation of drug tax stamps, and for obstruction of an officer, after a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11525 - 2005-03-31
for marijuana possession, for nonaffixation of drug tax stamps, and for obstruction of an officer, after a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11525 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
privilege under Wis. Stat. § 118.31(3)(h) is an affirmative defense at trial and is not to be considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95649 - 2013-04-15
privilege under Wis. Stat. § 118.31(3)(h) is an affirmative defense at trial and is not to be considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95649 - 2013-04-15
John Heineke v. Charlene Lunsmann
for lack of personal jurisdiction. He claims the trial court erred in concluding that Lunsmann’s lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15893 - 2005-03-31
for lack of personal jurisdiction. He claims the trial court erred in concluding that Lunsmann’s lengthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15893 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference on December 19, 2012. Jordan appeared, but Hooters did not. The court set a trial date
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110285 - 2017-09-21
conference on December 19, 2012. Jordan appeared, but Hooters did not. The court set a trial date
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110285 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thadeus W. Stone
. § 346.63(1)(a). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress. 2 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17759 - 2017-09-21
. § 346.63(1)(a). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress. 2 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17759 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
registry violation. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68248 - 2011-07-18
registry violation. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68248 - 2011-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
disciplinary decision. He argues error in the administrative proceeding, and in the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23
disciplinary decision. He argues error in the administrative proceeding, and in the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23
[PDF]
Susan Bauer v. Dawn Willison
MUNICIPAL CODE § 11.10(1)(a). A trial, in DeForest municipal court, was held on January 8, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14378 - 2014-09-15
MUNICIPAL CODE § 11.10(1)(a). A trial, in DeForest municipal court, was held on January 8, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14378 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
, Ashmore filed a postconviction motion seeking a new trial. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26286 - 2006-08-28
, Ashmore filed a postconviction motion seeking a new trial. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26286 - 2006-08-28
Vera Flanagan v. City of New London
the verdict answers and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court denied New London's motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7713 - 2005-03-31
the verdict answers and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court denied New London's motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7713 - 2005-03-31