Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32391 - 32400 of 74601 for public records.
Search results 32391 - 32400 of 74601 for public records.
All City Communication Company, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
such findings are “not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5222 - 2005-03-31
such findings are “not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5222 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley Alan St. George
evidentiary discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of the record. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3159 - 2005-03-31
evidentiary discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of the record. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3159 - 2005-03-31
State v. Otis G. Mattox
necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated.” Id. at 580 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25143 - 2006-06-27
necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated.” Id. at 580 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25143 - 2006-06-27
2007 WI APP 193
on the brief of John P. Tedesco, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29733 - 2007-08-27
on the brief of John P. Tedesco, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29733 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 2, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
that they had some misguided … or could have from this record have some misguided sense that the Defense had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98739 - 2013-07-01
that they had some misguided … or could have from this record have some misguided sense that the Defense had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98739 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
. (Record citations omitted.) We agree. ¶17 During the Machner hearing, when questioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40509 - 2014-09-15
. (Record citations omitted.) We agree. ¶17 During the Machner hearing, when questioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40509 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). “The record must ‘reflect the circuit court’s reasoned application of the appropriate legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130141 - 2017-09-21
omitted). “The record must ‘reflect the circuit court’s reasoned application of the appropriate legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
individual’s treatment record, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314012 - 2020-12-16
individual’s treatment record, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314012 - 2020-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. The judge entered the jury’s notes into the record and informed counsel that he was going to bring the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28476 - 2007-04-23
. The judge entered the jury’s notes into the record and informed counsel that he was going to bring the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28476 - 2007-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no- merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152304 - 2017-09-21
a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no- merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152304 - 2017-09-21