Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3241 - 3250 of 69368 for as he.
Search results 3241 - 3250 of 69368 for as he.
[PDF]
NOTICE
alleges that he or she did not understand information that should have been provided at the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48616 - 2014-09-15
alleges that he or she did not understand information that should have been provided at the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48616 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
alleges that he or she did not understand information that should have been provided at the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48616 - 2006-03-27
alleges that he or she did not understand information that should have been provided at the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48616 - 2006-03-27
State v. David L. Harmon
of force. See Wis. Stat. § 940.225(2)(a) (1997-98).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15100 - 2005-03-31
of force. See Wis. Stat. § 940.225(2)(a) (1997-98).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Gordon argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he was denied his right to a fair trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252205 - 2020-01-14
. Gordon argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he was denied his right to a fair trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252205 - 2020-01-14
State v. Daniel J. Konshak
of § 948.21, Stats. (Court of Appeals case no. 94-2810-CR-NM). He also appeals from judgments convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8202 - 2005-03-31
of § 948.21, Stats. (Court of Appeals case no. 94-2810-CR-NM). He also appeals from judgments convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David L. Harmon
assault by use of force. See WIS. STAT. § 940.225(2)(a) (1997-98).1 He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15100 - 2017-09-21
assault by use of force. See WIS. STAT. § 940.225(2)(a) (1997-98).1 He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15100 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel Konshak
of § 948.21, Stats. (Court of Appeals case no. 94-2810-CR-NM). He also appeals from judgments convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8791 - 2005-03-31
of § 948.21, Stats. (Court of Appeals case no. 94-2810-CR-NM). He also appeals from judgments convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8791 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Konshak
of § 948.21, Stats. (Court of Appeals case no. 94-2810-CR-NM). He also appeals from judgments convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8201 - 2005-03-31
of § 948.21, Stats. (Court of Appeals case no. 94-2810-CR-NM). He also appeals from judgments convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
offense, and an order denying his postconviction motion. Madeiros argues that he is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582814 - 2022-10-27
offense, and an order denying his postconviction motion. Madeiros argues that he is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=582814 - 2022-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his “Postremand Motion” (hereinafter, “postdisposition motion”). He argues that: (1) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165071 - 2017-09-21
denying his “Postremand Motion” (hereinafter, “postdisposition motion”). He argues that: (1) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165071 - 2017-09-21