Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3241 - 3250 of 29412 for er.

Randy Weed v. Dorene Weed
maintenance only upon a substantial change of circumstances, and that the court erred in any event by awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7027 - 2005-03-31

Reginald D. Phillips v. Department of Public Instruction
proceedings, and affirming the license revocations. Phillips argues that the trial court erred in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7841 - 2005-03-31

State v. Justin W. Smith
a judgment convicting him of sexually assaulting a six-year-old boy. He argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12728 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in this small-claims case. The crux of his contention is that the circuit court erred in determining that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30224 - 2007-09-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
matter jurisdiction over this appeal). Bernegger’s argument that the circuit court erred in denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172264 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
need not discuss subjective bias further. Peterson argues that the circuit court erred by not holding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157543 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steven Blank
court erred by allowing the hearing on the § 974.06, Stats., motion to go forward while Blank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11734 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
restitution.” He alleged that: (1) the trial court erred when it ordered him to pay restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51613 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
2 additionally contends this court erred when it failed to remand this matter on direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44824 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. Miller claims the trial court erred in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27034 - 2006-11-06