Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3241 - 3250 of 55745 for n y c.
Search results 3241 - 3250 of 55745 for n y c.
COURT OF APPEALS
of substantial battery.” As to the jury instruction, the entirety of Dillon’s prejudice argument is that “[b]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143653 - 2015-06-29
of substantial battery.” As to the jury instruction, the entirety of Dillon’s prejudice argument is that “[b]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143653 - 2015-06-29
State v. Jeffrey Benes
] say? My name is Jeffrey Benes. I live at such and such address. My social security number is X-Y-Z
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14770 - 2005-03-31
] say? My name is Jeffrey Benes. I live at such and such address. My social security number is X-Y-Z
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14770 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
asked Hess, “[Y]ou did as a party to the crime with the intent to steal take property from the person
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113227 - 2017-09-21
asked Hess, “[Y]ou did as a party to the crime with the intent to steal take property from the person
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113227 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. The policy defines insureds, in relevant part, as “[y]ou and the residents of your household” who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63591 - 2011-05-04
. The policy defines insureds, in relevant part, as “[y]ou and the residents of your household” who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63591 - 2011-05-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
: [M]y concern is that when you are using [the] entrapment defense, you are in essence agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
: [M]y concern is that when you are using [the] entrapment defense, you are in essence agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that “[b]y preconceiving that Delarosa’s punishment should be similar to some other unidentified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
contends that “[b]y preconceiving that Delarosa’s punishment should be similar to some other unidentified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
[PDF]
State v. Henry Bloomfield
disagreed, stating: [Y]ou may be able to argue that butt out, its my case has some relevance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5636 - 2017-09-19
disagreed, stating: [Y]ou may be able to argue that butt out, its my case has some relevance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that with strangulation “[y]ou are choking off their breath.” The court inferred that such an act is “[e]ssentially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110587 - 2017-09-21
that with strangulation “[y]ou are choking off their breath.” The court inferred that such an act is “[e]ssentially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110587 - 2017-09-21
Tyrone Hill v. Dean Medical Center
where Lubicky read the following from a report he had written: [M]y reason for getting involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11625 - 2005-03-31
where Lubicky read the following from a report he had written: [M]y reason for getting involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11625 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the parties to their children[.]” The court then explained: [M]y position generally is that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89039 - 2012-12-04
of the parties to their children[.]” The court then explained: [M]y position generally is that the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89039 - 2012-12-04