Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3241 - 3250 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 3241 - 3250 of 58245 for speedy trial.
State v. William F. Williams
which denied postconviction relief from the judgment.[1] Williams claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
which denied postconviction relief from the judgment.[1] Williams claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, her lawyer’s constitutionally deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, her lawyer’s constitutionally deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for relief. She argues that she is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for relief. She argues that she is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as charged, and the State agreed to recommend “prison, leaving the amount up to the [c]ourt.” The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179817 - 2017-09-21
as charged, and the State agreed to recommend “prison, leaving the amount up to the [c]ourt.” The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179817 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Kollmann
to WIS. STAT. § 940.225(3) No. 03-3490-CR 2 (2001-02) 1 after a jury trial and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7184 - 2017-09-20
to WIS. STAT. § 940.225(3) No. 03-3490-CR 2 (2001-02) 1 after a jury trial and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7184 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony at trial or any criminal proceeding against him. ¶4 Hubbard resolved all charges against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467402 - 2021-12-28
testimony at trial or any criminal proceeding against him. ¶4 Hubbard resolved all charges against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467402 - 2021-12-28
[PDF]
Rock County v. Amy L.
. She argues that her trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to damaging testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14169 - 2014-09-15
. She argues that her trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to damaging testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14169 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., Kessler and Brash, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. John M. Anthony, pro se, appeals from trial court orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164163 - 2017-09-21
., Kessler and Brash, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. John M. Anthony, pro se, appeals from trial court orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164163 - 2017-09-21
Rock County v. Amy L.
orders terminating her parental rights to Fantasia C. and Laniah C. She argues that her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14168 - 2005-03-31
orders terminating her parental rights to Fantasia C. and Laniah C. She argues that her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14168 - 2005-03-31
Rock County v. Amy L.
orders terminating her parental rights to Fantasia C. and Laniah C. She argues that her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14169 - 2005-03-31
orders terminating her parental rights to Fantasia C. and Laniah C. She argues that her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14169 - 2005-03-31