Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32401 - 32410 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32401 - 32410 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a felon in possession of a firearm. Lewis filed a motion to suppress the gun evidence on the grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638534 - 2023-03-28
a felon in possession of a firearm. Lewis filed a motion to suppress the gun evidence on the grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638534 - 2023-03-28
State v. John A. Clements
asserts that the trial judge wrongly applied Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1) in denying his motion. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2734 - 2005-03-31
asserts that the trial judge wrongly applied Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1) in denying his motion. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2734 - 2005-03-31
State v. James W. Breseman
, 1997, Breseman’s attorney reappeared in the case and filed a motion to withdraw Breseman’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13647 - 2005-03-31
, 1997, Breseman’s attorney reappeared in the case and filed a motion to withdraw Breseman’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
orders denying his motion for resentencing. 1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123855 - 2017-09-21
orders denying his motion for resentencing. 1 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Kimmes
the trial court correctly denied the suppression motion, the judgment is affirmed. After the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13129 - 2017-09-21
the trial court correctly denied the suppression motion, the judgment is affirmed. After the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13129 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
on the matter, the circuit court denied Cortese’s motion. The court determined that the note went
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102330 - 2013-11-25
on the matter, the circuit court denied Cortese’s motion. The court determined that the note went
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102330 - 2013-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Rule 809.19(1)(d). Rather, he provides an analysis of “Exhibit A” from his motion hearing interspersed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27340 - 2007-12-03
. Rule 809.19(1)(d). Rather, he provides an analysis of “Exhibit A” from his motion hearing interspersed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27340 - 2007-12-03
Shannon Jeanne Krug v. Theodore Richard Krug
when it denied Shannon’s motion for reconsideration without a hearing. None of these issues have merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19033 - 2005-07-19
when it denied Shannon’s motion for reconsideration without a hearing. None of these issues have merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19033 - 2005-07-19
State v. Michael A. Blackmon
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13836 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13836 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
and from orders denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2005-03-31
and from orders denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2005-03-31