Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32401 - 32410 of 44722 for part.
Search results 32401 - 32410 of 44722 for part.
COURT OF APPEALS
of a firearm. ¶3 As part of a negotiated settlement, Trotter pled guilty to the original charge of armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126712 - 2014-11-11
of a firearm. ¶3 As part of a negotiated settlement, Trotter pled guilty to the original charge of armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126712 - 2014-11-11
State v. Eugene A. Pagois
directions and the two men parted, Pagois purportedly headed to Chicago and Jorgensen towards his daughter's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9135 - 2005-03-31
directions and the two men parted, Pagois purportedly headed to Chicago and Jorgensen towards his daughter's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his implication that these questions are mandatory parts of a plea colloquy. Before accepting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
his implication that these questions are mandatory parts of a plea colloquy. Before accepting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054397 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
State v. Emmanuel Pettis
the statement about Pettis’s unemployed status. The trial court found that the information was part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5738 - 2017-09-19
the statement about Pettis’s unemployed status. The trial court found that the information was part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5738 - 2017-09-19
Paras Reddy v. Town of Belmont
approval in May of 1996. On June 11, 1996, the Town adopted a moratorium which stated in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13512 - 2005-03-31
approval in May of 1996. On June 11, 1996, the Town adopted a moratorium which stated in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13512 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
inadequate knowledge on Madderom’s part. ¶17 In asserting that there was procedural unconscionability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31433 - 2008-01-09
inadequate knowledge on Madderom’s part. ¶17 In asserting that there was procedural unconscionability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31433 - 2008-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
degree of medical probability. ¶15 The more substantive part of Agrilink’s argument is that Grace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30560 - 2007-10-09
degree of medical probability. ¶15 The more substantive part of Agrilink’s argument is that Grace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30560 - 2007-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. Seaman’s motion to suppress was denied. ¶9 The court made its determination in two parts. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58922 - 2011-01-18
. Seaman’s motion to suppress was denied. ¶9 The court made its determination in two parts. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58922 - 2011-01-18
[PDF]
State v. Frank Machado
all grounds as part of the direct 3 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8993 - 2017-09-19
all grounds as part of the direct 3 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8993 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
nonconforming status, provides in pertinent part: The sign must remain substantially the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107790 - 2017-09-21
nonconforming status, provides in pertinent part: The sign must remain substantially the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107790 - 2017-09-21