Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32401 - 32410 of 74557 for public records.

[PDF] NOTICE
testimony of Morris and are supported in the record. In short, it found that Morris and his colleague had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert L. King
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Glenn L. Cushing, Assistant State Public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12523 - 2005-03-31

Rock County v. Amy L.
was not ineffective. 2. Records of Regularly Conducted Activity Amy L. contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14169 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Edron D. Broomfield
state public defender. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Paul Lundsten
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17215 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 2, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
that they had some misguided … or could have from this record have some misguided sense that the Defense had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98739 - 2013-07-01

Karen Suchomel v. University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
of the pleadings and the record as it stands right this moment, Gorman [v. Wausau Ins. Cos. 175 Wis. 2d 320, 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20007 - 2005-12-11

State v. Bradley Alan St. George
evidentiary discretion in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of the record. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3159 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Karen Suchomel v. University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
questions, as set forth in the motions. The court shall inform counsel on the record of its proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20007 - 2017-09-21

State v. Victor Naydihor
agreement before learning the extent of Naydihor’s prior record. Naydihor’s counsel argued for probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2007-07-11

State v. Otis G. Mattox
necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated.” Id. at 580 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25143 - 2006-06-27